Loading…
Loading…
Code review, test generation and data migration — in GitHub or GitLab, with a person approving the merge.
The three the team asks for first, installed in its own systems. No call; every option is credited against the next for 30 days.
In the words a team uses for them. Every row is a standard blueprint: what arrives, what happens, who approves, a free template, and what it costs to have it installed or run for you.
| The work, as you describe it | The automation | Steps | From | Run for you |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pull requests wait a day for a first review, and the reviewer's first comments are style and missing tests. | Automated Code Review | 8 | $49 | $247/month |
| Coverage is 40% and every sprint ends with “we will add tests next time”. | Unit Test Generation | 8 | $49 | $247/month |
| The field-mapping spreadsheet has 400 rows, three authors and no version. | Data Migration | 8 | $49 | $297/month |
Every pull request gets a first review within minutes — concrete bugs and risks on the exact lines, not style notes.
Every message a person sees is drafted, never sent, until that type of message has earned auto-send in the first weeks.
Proof
Real engagements; names, places and some numbers changed under NDA.
How a fintech company used an AI coding agent to migrate 180K lines of Java to Kotlin, completing in 8 weeks instead of the estimated 20 weeks with manual conversion.
Unit Test Generation · Automated Code ReviewHow a 30-person fintech startup used AI QA agents to more than double test coverage and ship weekly with confidence.
Automated Code Review · Unit Test GenerationHow a 40-person development agency deployed AI coding agents to cut code review time in half while catching more bugs.
Installed in the accounts the team already pays for. No new login; you own the result. A tool not listed is named in the order and confirmed by email before anything is installed.
FAQ
The 3 on this page — automated code review, unit test generation, data migration. Each is a standard blueprint with a free template; start with the one that eats the most hours, usually automated code review.
Most often CI (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI), Target APIs (HubSpot, Salesforce, Zendesk…). The automation is installed in the tools the team already pays for; you own the result, and there is nothing new to log into.
No call. Installed for you: $249 one-time, live within two working days of access, with a recorded walkthrough and 30 days of fixes. Run for you: a monthly subscription with setup and maintenance included. Not sure which process first: the free audit — a few questions, the plan in minutes.
Wherever money, a customer or an employee record is involved: an approval step is part of every blueprint on this page, and the first weeks run in approval mode — the automation drafts, a person confirms — until a message type has earned auto-send.
When one of the blueprint's custom conditions is you — usually a system without an API, a rule set nobody has written down, or volume that needs its own infrastructure. Custom builds start at $2,000, are scoped by email from the audit, and the package or the first month is credited against them.
Not sure which first?
Describe the work that repeats and answer a few one-tap details. The plan names the process to start with, one option, one price — on the page and in your inbox in minutes. No call.